Static Ip Addresses on 1722

Moderator Anmeldungsdatum: 08.11.2004 Beiträge: 4571 Wohnort: Aachen

Hi Voixes,

Zitat:

Do I perhaps have to ack also on the inverse masquerading?

no, inverse masquerading is only needed, if the LANCOM owns the addresses.
I hope you configured the masquerading option of the default route (ip-router -> routing -> routing table -> route 255.255.255.255) to "masking intranet only"

regards
Backslash

Anmeldungsdatum: 25.09.2006 Beiträge: 17

[/quote]

no, inverse masquerading is only needed, if the LANCOM owns the addresses.
I hope you configured the masquerading option of the default route (ip-router -> routing -> routing table -> route 255.255.255.255) to "masking intranet only"
[/quote]

Yes I have...
and everything is configured as the previews screenshots that I've sent you couple of weeks ago (except the fact that I've emptied the Loopback addresses table). You need more screen to understand better the situation?

Thank you a lot

Kind and best regards

Tommaso

Anmeldungsdatum: 25.09.2006 Beiträge: 17

News?

Moderator Anmeldungsdatum: 08.11.2004 Beiträge: 4571 Wohnort: Aachen

Hi Voixes

Zitat:

News?

no... it should work if you just configure the DMZ, set the masquerading option of the default route to "masking intranet only" and add the needed N:N-NAT entries.

This is also described here http://www2.lancom.de/kb.nsf/a5ddf4817397f...NAT,German

sorry, this page is in german and there is no englich version in LANCOM's knowledge base, but it describes just the three points i told you (try to find the corresponding dialogues in the english version of LANconfig)

regards
Backslash